Full 2012 Institutional Self Evaluation Report

• Certification of the Institutional Self Evaluation Report (page 6)
• Table of Contents (Page 8)
• Introduction (Page 12)
• Abstract (Page 46)
• Organization of the Self Evaluation (Page 54)
• Organizational Information (Page 60)
• Certification of Continued Institutional Compliance with Eligibility Requirements (Page 73)
• Responses to Recommendations from the Most Recent Comprehensive Evaluation (Page 84)
• Institutional Self Evaluation Using Commission Standards (Page 98)
  • Standard I (Page 98)
  • Standard II (Page 126)
  • Standard III (Page 224)
  • Standard IV (Page 292)
• Action Plans (Page 324)

Evidence Files Repository Link

Full 2012-2013 Educational Master Plan

• APPENDIX A Annual Program Reviews 2011-2012
• APPENDIX B Comprehensive Program Reviews
• APPENDIX C SLO SAO Committee Report
• APPENDIX D Staffing Planing Committee Report
• APPENDIX E Technology Planning Committee Report
• APPENDIX F Facilities Planning Committee Report 
• APPENDIX G Planning and Budget Committee Report
• APPENDIX H Professional Development Committtee Report
• APPENDIX I Marketing Planning Committee Report
• APPENDIX J Student Services Committee Report

Full 2011-2012 Educational Master Plan

• Appendix A 2010-2011 Annual Program Reviews
• Appendix B 2010-2011 Comprehensive Program Reviews
• Appendix C SLO SAO Committee Report
• Appendix D Staffing Planning Committee Report
• Appendix E Technology Planning Committee Report
• Appendix F Facilities Planning Committee Report
• Appendix G Planning and Budget Report
• Appendix H Professional Development Committee Report
• Appendix I Marketing Planning Committee Report
• Appendix J Student Services Resource Planning Committee Report

I am thrilled to announce that we have been removed from warning status and our accreditation has been reaffirmed by the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.

I received this great news over the weekend via a phone call from the Commission and the letter was awaiting on the fax when I arrived here this morning.

While we still have other challenges ahead, let’s all pause to reflect upon how we came together as a campus team over these past two years to improve our processes and  planning to deal with the concerns and recommendations put forward by the Commission.

We noted in our report to the Commission that while we are an imperfect team at times, we are united in our desire to do what is best for students. This was proven in the way we developed a united effort to deal with this accreditation issue.

I want to thank everyone who gave up of their personal time to assist in this effort. We are a better institution because of what we have gone through and our students will definitely be the ultimate beneficiaries.

While there are MANY people who we need to thank, I do want to single out Vice President Kathy Berry and Dean Tina Aguirre for their leadership in this monumental campus wide effort.
Our next Accreditation cycle will take place in 2012 with a new Self Study followed by the Accreditation visit in 2013.

Meanwhile, we will be incorporating the lessons learned from this effort by continually working on Accreditation standards and documenting this work as we move forward. Our Continuous Accreditation Review Team (CART) will be key in this effort.

Let’s take this moment to celebrate what we have accomplished as a team.
Thank you all!

Ed Gould, Ed.D.
Superintendent/President
Imperial Community College District

Full 2010 Educational Master Plan

Full Midterm Report

• Statement on Report Preparation
  
• Responses to Team Recommendations and the Commission Action Letter
  
• Response to Self-Identified Issues
  
• List of Evidence Documents
• Evidence Documents (Updated 03-16-2010)
  

2009 Evaluation Letter

Full Progress Report

• Certification of the Accreditation Progress Report
• Statement on Preparation
• Timeline of Activities
• Response to Recommendation One
• Chart A - IVC Planning Process
• Chart B - IVC Program Review Planning Stream
• Chart C - IVC Shared Governance Planning Process
• Response to Recommendation Two
• Response to Recommendation Three
• Response to Recommendation Four
• Response to Recommendation Five
• Response to Recommendation Six
• List of Evidence Documents